Scuderia Cameron Glickenhaus made a very respectable management, though not stellar 24 Hours of Le Mans First entry. The SCG 007s, its hypercar-class contenders designed to fight for the overall victory, finished four and seven laps behind the race-winning #7 Toyota GR010 Hybrid. They also finished behind the lone Alpine, a tweaked LMP1 car that was grandfathered in for this year’s event. By the end of the race the difference between the speed of the Alpine and the two Glickenhaus machines was about 2 minutes 30 seconds.
None of this is probably what the team expected, but the goalposts at Le Mans are different. Completing a race is an achievement in itself, especially when you’re building your own car and you’ve never fought it before. Glickenhaus has attracted an avid fanbase as David has affixed it to Toyota, the remaining Goliath of Le Mans after every other automaker canceled its factory-backed, top-class program. SCG has a lot to root for and the team has a lot to be proud of.
Boss James Glickenhaus, though – he’s not pleased. On Friday, they took issue with the FIA (which bans the World Endurance Championship) and the ACO (which bans Le Mans) for not adequately balancing performance between their cars and Toyota’s. From Motorsport.com:
“The fact that he had issues and still finished miles ahead is not correct,” Glickenhaus told Motorsport.com.
“The balance between us and Alpine was incredibly good, but Toyota was on a different planet.
“We were told that we would race in a BoP category, that everyone had a fair chance, but what I saw in the race was not like a BoP class.”
This is the first year Hypercars has run at WEC or Le Mans. Balancing performance is a difficult task for the engineer. On the one hand, you’ve got to allow teams to be innovative and find technical solutions to complex problems to get their deserved rewards; Basically, they should be able to make a better race car than their competitors. but you Too The gap was found to be within reason, while accounting for the potentially large budgetary gap (as is the case between Toyota and SCG) to keep the racing relatively close and exciting.
Creating an effective BoP formula takes time, trial and error, and hypercars just don’t have enough. Hell, the LMDH class that’s going to be balanced with this won’t arrive in earnest until 2023, and it’s likely that everything will turn upside down again.
It’s a razor’s edge that regulators have to tread. But SCG is a privateer, driving a rear-wheel-drive car powered by a V8, while their main rival uses a complex all-wheel-drive hybrid system. It’s working the old-fashioned way, partly out of financial necessity and probably – I suspect, anyway – for the glory of slackling the V8 on the Mulsanne. Let’s be honest: Even with more years of development, it may never pose a threat to Toyota and all the other constructors that don’t have the resources.
I’m not saying that Glickenhaus should roll over and accept defeat. Anyone who has watched motorsport for 15 minutes knows that playing politics for an edge in the rules comes with territory. But that doesn’t mean it’s reasonable or worth expecting everyone to be brought to their level after a grueling race, Specially When that race is Le Mans with all its variables.
Glickenhaus expands on his special issue – the advantage of AWD over RWD in the top class – further down in the story:
According to Glickenhaus, the BoP also needs to reflect the benefits that come with running a front-axle hybrid system in adverse track conditions.
LMH regulations prohibit a four-wheel-drive car such as Toyota from deploying hybrid power through the front wheels at speeds of less than 120 km/h (75 mph) and when the car reaches 150 km/h (93 mph). ) it occurs. Not on a whim.
“A four-wheel drive car may have no advantage in the wet, but the track was disastrous in terms of grip long after the rain stopped and everyone was on slicks,” Glickenhaus explained.
“It has to be included in the BOP: This race showed that there is a big difference between all-wheel drive and two-wheel drive. Period.
The SCG 007 is the only rear-wheel-drive machine in the hypercar category. Where Alpine falls within that is not entirely relevant, as Alpine is a holdover that will not exist after next season. if there Was Another RWD hypercar that was equally uncompetitive even against Toyota, perhaps there is an argument to be made here. But it is not, so the integrity of the BoP cannot really be proved or disproved. There is an empty complaint to this.
In the months leading up to Le Mans, I’ve talked to many people who are really inspired by the ambition of the SCG. This is a commendable discovery and a reminder of the bygone era of motorsport. But you can’t go to that nice coast togetherEven when testing and performing “about two hours of wet-weather” An outdated concept in its first year and with a fraction of the budget, just foul cry. This is not a good look. Later throwing barbs completely unprovoked on sim racers and starting twitter beef With other sports car makers to copy you when you’re both copying the same archetype, it might do Glickenhaus some good to quit talking for the track.